Start Submission Become a Reviewer

Reading: Guessing Versus Judging After Mere Repeated Exposure


A- A+
Alt. Display

Research Article

Guessing Versus Judging After Mere Repeated Exposure


Norbert Vanbeselaere

Laboratorium voor Experimentele Sociale Psychologie Tiensestraat 102 3000 Leuven, BE
X close


This study examines the hypothesis that response competition by itself is not a sufficient condition to obtain the mere exposure effect Response competition is only one determinant of conflict. It must be made psychologically relevant in order to obtain the predicted mere exposure effects. In an attempt to manipulate this importance factor experimentally, subjects were cither asked to guess or to judge the meaning of the stimuli, ss' liking of the stimuli was not influenced by frequency of exposure when they were asked to guess. When they were asked to judge the meaning and when it was stressed that they should try to be as correct as possible, liking increased with increasing exposure (p < .05) but the frequency affect relationship was clearly U-shaped. Exploration decreased significantly in all conditions but a Frequency x Importance interaction (p < .05) was also obtained.
How to Cite: Vanbeselaere, N., 1977. Guessing Versus Judging After Mere Repeated Exposure. Psychologica Belgica, 17(1), pp.59–70. DOI:
Published on 01 Jan 1977.
Peer Reviewed


  • PDF (EN)

    comments powered by Disqus